Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7500 +34728%
12.19 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Oct 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
GT216
Navi 33
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy