Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1700MHz vs 1188MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7500 +567%
12.19 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1024 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
GM206
Navi 33
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy