Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 118% (1700MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7500 +2342%
12.19 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 33
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy