Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600 +818%
19.99 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy