Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600 +15159%
19.99 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
GT216
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy