Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600 +19890%
19.99 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
GF119
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy