Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600 +2688%
19.99 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy