Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600 +507%
19.99 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Sep 2014
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
190W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Tonga
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
5 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy