CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 32.26GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700
+34254%
31.95 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700
VS
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Nov 2023
Release Date
Sep 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.26GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
48
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Navi 32
GPU Name
G84
Navi 32
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Board Design
190W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700
2
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
3
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700
4
AMD Radeon R9 370 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700
6
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700
8
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs Intel Xe DG1
9
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
10
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy