Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 190W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Nov 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
-
192
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
44W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
RV535
Navi 32
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy