Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +1856%
44.78 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

70
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4480
Shading Units
1536
280
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GK104
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy