Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +15892%
44.78 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
70
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
112
280
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G92
Navi 31
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
78W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy