CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
VS
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800
+15892%
44.78 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800
VS
Quadro FX 3700
Graphics Card
Apr 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
70
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
112
280
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
G92
Navi 31
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
260W
TDP
78W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
2
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GRID M40
3
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
4
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
5
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
6
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
7
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
8
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
9
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
10
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy