Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800 +2672%
44.78 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M
1.615 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
70
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
1344
280
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.83 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.31 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.615 TFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.31 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GK104
Navi 31
GPU Variant
N14E-Q5-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy