Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +24826%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Dec 2010
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
96
384
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GF108
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy