CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
VS
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
NVIDIA Quadro 600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 295W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900
+24826%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900
VS
Quadro 600
Graphics Card
Apr 2023
Release Date
Dec 2010
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
96
384
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
GF108
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Board Design
295W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
2
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Tesla P10
3
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
4
NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900
5
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210
6
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900
7
NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900
8
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
9
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
10
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy