Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
6072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +37751%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jun 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
9
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
72
384
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GT215
Navi 31
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy