Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +21800%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
6144
Shading Units
112
384
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
16
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

295W
TDP
78W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G92
Navi 31
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy