Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA A2

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1770MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
A2 +263%
4.531 TFLOPS
VS
A2

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Nov 2021
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GA107
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
103 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy