Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FireGL V8650

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +183%
1.248 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Aug 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
R600
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy