Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +117%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1600
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Cypress
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy