Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +5842%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
512
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
G98
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy