Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 105W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +680%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
512
Shading Units
64
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
G92
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy