Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 49W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +363%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GF108
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy