Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 135W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (52.48GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +200%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
135W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
G92
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy