Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 102W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (91.87GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +39%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2012
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
957 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
91.87GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
288
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.312 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.25 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
894.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
102W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GF114
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy