AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1785MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
+46%
1.828 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon Pro WX 2100
934
GeForce GTX 1630
+124%
2100
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon Pro WX 2100
282
GeForce GTX 1630
+237%
953
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2022
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
1740 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
TU117
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
