Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +288%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Hawaii
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy