Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +556%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Fiji
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy