Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1219MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 460 1024SP +96%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2017
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.458 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Baffin
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy