Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Feb 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV530
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy