Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +3800%
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
2
512
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV620
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy