Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +385%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Nov 2009
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
512
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GT215
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy