Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +1460%
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
1
512
Shading Units
80
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Cedar
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy