Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +24%
1.248 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV770
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy