Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 240W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3100 +162%
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XTX
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
240W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
R600
Lexa XT
GPU Variant
R600 XTX A11 (215RGMDKA11FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy