Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile +6%
1.385 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Apr 2011
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
12
640
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy