Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock1515MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +124%
3.103 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Apr 2020
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1380 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1515 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
640
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.48 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.96 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.205 TFLOPS
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.103 TFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
TU117
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy