Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +196%
4.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
10
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
TU116
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy