Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM +55%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Sep 2016
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
14
640
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Baffin
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy