Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 M260 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile +84%
1.385 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jun 2014
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
940 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Topaz
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy