Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +3847%
1.658 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jun 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
RV610
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy