Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro D300 +31%
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jan 2014
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy