Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +205%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Hawaii
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy