Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +165%
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
6
640
Shading Units
480
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Turks
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy