Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro V5700

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro V5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +270%
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
56W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
RV730
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy