Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +4151%
1.658 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Apr 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
640
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
GT218
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy