Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +79%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
TU117
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy