Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti +227%
5.437 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Feb 2019
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.96 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
169.9 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.87 TFLOPS
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.437 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
169.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
TU116
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
TU116-400-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy