Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +19%
1.658 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1.389 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Feb 2014
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1020 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
GM107
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
GM107-400-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Maxwell
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy