Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +232%
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Oland
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy