Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8100 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 8100 +2490%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2017
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1792MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
3584
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy